Howard v. US District Court
Howard v. US District Court
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1736
EMMA V. HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Middle District of NC; FRANK W. BULLOCK, JR., Individually and in his capacity as Honorable Chief Judge; ROMALLUS O. MURPHY, Individually and in his official capacity as attorney for civil right and labor law defendant; J. P. CREEKMORE, Individually and in his capacity as Clerk of United States District Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-97-1)
Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emma V. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Emma V. Howard appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. United States
District Court, No. CA-98-97-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished