Considder v. Sheppard
Considder v. Sheppard
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1699
HERBERT ARTHUR CONSIDDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDDIE SHEPPARD; TOM AUSTIN; GREG ATLER; HALMODE APPAREL, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Kelwood & Company,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1072-R)
Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Arthur Considder, Appellant Pro Se. William Fain Ruther- ford, Jr., Kerith Cohen, FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD & JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Herbert A. Considder appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for reconsideration of its order
dismissing his claims under the American with Disabilities Act,
42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213(West 1995 & Supp. 1998), and the Age Dis-
crimination in Employment Act,
29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634(1994). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Considder v.
Sheppard, No. CA-96-1072-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 17, 1998; Apr 13, 1998).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished