UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1699

HERBERT ARTHUR CONSIDDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

EDDIE SHEPPARD; TOM AUSTIN; GREG ATLER; HALMODE APPAREL, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Kelwood & Company, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1072-R)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Arthur Considder, Appellant Pro Se. William Fain Ruther- ford, Jr., Kerith Cohen, FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD & JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Herbert A. Considder appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for reconsideration of its order dismissing his claims under the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 1998), and the Age Dis- crimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Considder v. Sheppard, No. CA-96-1072-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 17, 1998; Apr 13, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED