U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Trent v. Commonwealth of VA

Trent v. Commonwealth of VA
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 13, 1998

Trent v. Commonwealth of VA

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2593

JOHN J. “SWARTZ” TRENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-98-72-L)

Submitted: November 3, 1998 Decided: November 13, 1998

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John J. Trent, Appellant Pro Se. James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John J. “Swartz” Trent appeals the district court order dis- missing that part of his complaint seeking monetary damages. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.