Wilson v. Gunn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wilson v. Gunn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6360

IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT BOLLINGER; SCOTT STEIGER; RICHARD S. NAJJAR; S. S. BOWIE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

WILLIAM E. GUNN; SOUTH CAROLINA PAROLE AND PARDON BOARD; DUANE SHULER, Honorable; RICH WEATHERINGTON; DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT; DANIEL FARNSWORTH; ROBERT M. DUDEK; B. FAITH MARTZIN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-1828-6-18-AK)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Irvin Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Ac-

cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson

v. Gunn, No. CA-97-1828-6-18-AK (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 1998). We deny

Wilson’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal con-

tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished