Wilson v. Gunn
Wilson v. Gunn
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6360
IRVIN JEFFERSON WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
ROBERT BOLLINGER; SCOTT STEIGER; RICHARD S.
NAJJAR; S. S. BOWIE, Defendants - Appellees, and
WILLIAM E. GUNN; SOUTH CAROLINA PAROLE AND PARDON BOARD; DUANE SHULER, Honorable; RICH WEATHERINGTON; DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT; DANIEL FARNSWORTH; ROBERT M. DUDEK; B. FAITH MARTZIN, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-1828-6-18-AK)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irvin Jefferson Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner, Jr., CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Irvin Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Gunn, No. CA-97-1828-6-18-AK (D.S.C. Feb. 2, 1998). We deny Wilson’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal con- tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.