United States v. Brito
United States v. Brito
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6192
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
AMBROSIO S. BRITO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-94-33-F, CA-97-86-7-F)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ambrosio S. Brito, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ambrosio S. Brito seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Brito, Nos. CR-94-33-F; CA-
97-86-7-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1997). We deny Brito’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished