Dillard v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dillard v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6823

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GUY ANTHONY DILLARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-173, CA-97-589-R)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 19, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy Anthony Dillard, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Guy Anthony Dillard seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Dillard v. United States, Nos. CR-93-

173; CA-97-589-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1998). We deny Dillard’s motion

for reconsideration of his motion to remand and stay the case. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished