Tucker v. Dalton
Tucker v. Dalton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1845
LOYLESS B. TUCKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
REGINALD A. LEE, SR.; WILLIAM E. REID, JR.; JOHN Q. PUBLIC,
Intervenor - Plaintiff,
versus
JOHN B. DALTON, Secretary; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendants - Appellees,
JAMES L. CRAWFORD,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-113-2-18AJ)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Loyless B. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Loyless Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying
relief in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis-
trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Dalton, No. CA-96-
113-2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished