U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Tucker v. Dalton

Tucker v. Dalton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1998

Tucker v. Dalton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1845

LOYLESS B. TUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

REGINALD A. LEE, SR.; WILLIAM E. REID, JR.; JOHN Q. PUBLIC, Intervenor - Plaintiff, versus

JOHN B. DALTON, Secretary; DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Defendants - Appellees,

JAMES L. CRAWFORD, Movant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-113-2-18AJ)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Loyless B. Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Loyless Tucker appeals the district court’s order denying relief in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Dalton, No. CA-96- 113-2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.