Aloupis v. Roop
Aloupis v. Roop
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2408
MARY ALOUPIS; CHRIS ALOUPIS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
JOHN JOSEPH ROOP; CARGILL, INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98- 2597-MJG)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 18, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mary Aloupis, Chris Aloupis, Appellants Pro Se. Scott Douglas Goetsch, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Mary and Chris Aloupis appeal the district court’s order dis-
missing for lack of jurisdiction their civil action in which they
sought damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Aloupis v. Roop, No. CA-98-2597-MJG (D. Md. Sept.
1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished