U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Palmer

United States v. Palmer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 1998

United States v. Palmer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6410

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES EDDIE PALMER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-93-90, CA-97-428-N)

Submitted: October 30, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Eddie Palmer, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Palmer, Nos. CR-93-90; CA-97-428-N (E.D.

Va. Jan. 12, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.