UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2281

REID R. ROGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, CIRCUIT COURT; FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND; INVESTIGA- TIVE COUNSEL; COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISABILI- TIES; JAMES DOBSON, Doctor; RUSH LIMBAUGH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-2599-WMN)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998

Before ERVIN, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reid R. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Reid R. Rogers appeals the district court’s order denying re-

lief on his

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Rogers v. Montgomery County, No. CA-98-2599-WMN (D.

Md. Aug. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2