Gardner v. United States
Gardner v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6966
DENNIS GERALD GARDNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge; Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-49, CA-97-758-R)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Gerald Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Albert Lloret, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia; John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dennis Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp.
1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Gardner v. United States, Nos. CR-96-49; CA-97-758-R
(W.D. Va. June 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished