U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Bryant v. Colonial Pipeline Co

Bryant v. Colonial Pipeline Co
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 23, 1998

Bryant v. Colonial Pipeline Co

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1657

KENNETH M. BRYANT; BETSY H. BRYANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and

BRYANT WASTE MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, versus

COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY; ELDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-208-L)

Submitted: September 22, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth M. Bryant, Betsy H. Bryant, Appellants Pro Se. Clayton Lewis Walton, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CHRISTIAN, & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Appel- lees’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement and denying Appel- lants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bryant v. Colonial Pipeline Co. No. CA-88-208-L (W.D. Va. May 4, 1998). We deny Appellants’ motion for appointment of coun- sel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.