United States v. Witherspoon
United States v. Witherspoon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7316
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
OSTER WITHERSPOON, a/k/a Little Man,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-288, CA-96-3536-8-2)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Oster Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, As- sistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Oster Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Witherspoon, Nos. CR-91-
288; CA-96-3536-8-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished