U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Witherspoon

United States v. Witherspoon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 3, 1998

United States v. Witherspoon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7316

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

OSTER WITHERSPOON, a/k/a Little Man, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-288, CA-96-3536-8-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oster Witherspoon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, As- sistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Oster Witherspoon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Witherspoon, Nos. CR-91- 288; CA-96-3536-8-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.