United States v. Perkins
United States v. Perkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7062
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAIRUS KIOWA PERKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-30029, CA-97-434-R)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dairus Kiowa Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dairus Kiowa Perkins seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994
& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Perkins, Nos. CR-96-30029; CA-97-434-R
(W.D. Va. July 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished