United States v. Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7290

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL DELANEY JOHNSON, a/k/a Jamil Abdul Aziz,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-93-390, CA-97-860-2-18)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Delaney Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Howe Hendricks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Delaney Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-

93-390; CA-97-860-2-18 (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished