U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Nance

United States v. Nance
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 1998

United States v. Nance

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-92-35-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jimmy Lawrence Nance appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his motion to disallow collection of fees and restitution. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nance, No. CR-92-35-R (W.D. Va. July 1, 1998). We deny Nance’s motion for transcripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.