U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. McColl

United States v. McColl
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 1998

United States v. McColl

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6882

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DEWROD MCCOLL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-193, CA-97-1329-1)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewrod McColl, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dewrod McColl appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McColl, Nos. CR-93-193; CA-97-1329-1 (M.D.N.C. June 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.