United States v. Jones
United States v. Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6898
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PATTAMUS JAMES JONES, III, a/k/a Pacman, a/k/a Pattimus, a/k/a Buddy Jones,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-187-R, CA-97-341-R)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pattamus James Jones, III, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, As- sistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Pattamus James Jones, III, seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Jones’ motions to supplement the record with documents not
presented to the district court, deny his motion for a certificate
of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-187-R; CA-97-
341-R (W.D. Va. May 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished