U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Hoggard

United States v. Hoggard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 1998

United States v. Hoggard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TERRENCE LEE HOGGARD, a/k/a Chuck, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-73, CA-97-427-2)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Lee Hoggard, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Terrence Lee Hoggard appeals the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability, deny a certificate of appealabil- ity, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Hoggard, Nos. CR-92-73; CA-97-427-2 (E.D. Va. Apr.

13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.