Richardson v. NC Dept of Corr
Richardson v. NC Dept of Corr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6875
PERCELL RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LOUIS NEWSOME, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-284-5-BR)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percell Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Percell Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction, No. CA-98-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.