U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Richardson v. NC Dept of Corr

Richardson v. NC Dept of Corr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 2, 1998

Richardson v. NC Dept of Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6875

PERCELL RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; LOUIS NEWSOME, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-284-5-BR)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percell Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Percell Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. North Carolina Dep’t of Correction, No. CA-98-284-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.