Muhammad v. Hudson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Muhammad v. Hudson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6933

ISMAIL MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Wayne Anthony Garrett,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. ALVIN HUDSON, Sheriff, Roanoke City Jail; M. MCMILLAN, Major; D. A. BLEVINS, Captain; R. D. ADKINS, Lieutenant; SERGEANT RATLIFF; SER- GEANT HULL; SERGEANT STUART; LEO B. WATKINS, Sergeant; TRAVIS CURTIS, Deputy; JAMES TROUT, Deputy; THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; CATHY WILLIAMS; KAREN MILLER, M.D.; CHUCK JENNINGS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-1231-R)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ismail Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Rider, RIDER, THOMAS, CLEAVELAND, FERRIS & EAKIN, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ismail Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for a new trial, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. Our review of the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Muhammad v. Hudson, No. CA-95-1231-R (W.D. Va. June 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished