Roebuck v. United States
Roebuck v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1219
STEVEN A. ROEBUCK, a resident of Wake County, North Carolina; DONNA ROEBUCK, a resident of Wake County, North Carolina,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-97-769-5-F-3)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven A. Roebuck, Donna Roebuck, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Edward Brookhart, Carol Ann Barthel, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Steven A. and Donna Roebuck appeal from the district court’s
order denying their petition to quash third-party recordkeeper
summonses issued by the Internal Revenue Service to a financial
institution and a certified public accountant firm and ordering
enforcement of the summonses. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no
clear error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Roebuck v. United States, No. CA-97-769-5-F-3
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished