McCoy v. Corcoran

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Corcoran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7035

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS-STAFF; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SER- VICE, INCORPORATED; ARESAHEGN GETACHEW, Dr., Medical Director; C. SANDERS, Administrative Nurse; A. M. ROACH, Ms., Duty Nurse; L. CONTEE, Ms.; MS. LINDSEY; K. O. JOHNSON, Mr.; MR. ISICK; ALL MEDICATION-TECH NURSES; UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, each defendant named is sued within their individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 1663-L)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Severn Eyre Savage Miller, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. McCoy v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1663-L (D. Md. July 1,

1998). We deny Appellant’s motions for appointment of counsel and

to extend the time in which to file a reply brief. We also deny

Appellant’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished