Wertz v. Foster
Wertz v. Foster
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7003
GEORGE R. WERTZ, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LEE FOSTER, Sheriff; JERRY WRIGHT; TODD JOHN- SON; DANNY GILLIAM; DAVID E. RUSHTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-2858-4-22BE)
Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George R. Wertz, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Spencer Verner, III, Newberry, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: George Wertz, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders grant- ing summary judgment against him on his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985(3), 1986 (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wertz v. Foster, No. CA-96-2858-4-22BE (D.S.C. June 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.