United States v. Frost
United States v. Frost
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6479
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BILLY DALTON FROST,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-253, CA-95-265-3-P)
Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Ap- pellant. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Billy Frost appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998)), and his application for
a writ of Audita Querela under
28 U.S.C. § 1651(1994). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Frost, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-95-265-
3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished