United States v. Frost

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Frost

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILLY DALTON FROST,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-253, CA-95-265-3-P)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Ap- pellant. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Billy Frost appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998)), and his application for

a writ of Audita Querela under

28 U.S.C. § 1651

(1994). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Frost, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-95-265-

3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished