U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Frost

United States v. Frost
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 15, 1998

United States v. Frost

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

BILLY DALTON FROST, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-253, CA-95-265-3-P)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: December 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas A. Trant, TRANT & ASSOCIATES, Knoxville, Tennessee, for Ap- pellant. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Billy Frost appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)), and his application for a writ of Audita Querela under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Frost, Nos. CR-92-253; CA-95-265- 3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.