United States v. Savoy
United States v. Savoy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT DION SAVOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-398-A, CA-94-1179-AM)
Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Dion Savoy, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Joseph Hulkower, Herbert W. Mondros, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Richard Joseph Pietrofeso, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Dion Savoy appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Savoy, Nos. CR-90-398-A; CA-94-1179-AM
(E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy,
521 U.S. 320(1997).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished