U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Savoy

United States v. Savoy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 21, 1998

United States v. Savoy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ROBERT DION SAVOY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-398-A, CA-94-1179-AM)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Dion Savoy, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Joseph Hulkower, Herbert W. Mondros, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Richard Joseph Pietrofeso, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert Dion Savoy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Savoy, Nos. CR-90-398-A; CA-94-1179-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320 (1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.