Fisher v. MD Dept Housing
Fisher v. MD Dept Housing
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1839
BOBBIE FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; RAYMOND SKINNER, both officially and individually; SUSAN GREGSON, both offi- cially and individually; GREGORY TAVIN, both officially and individually; RODNEY WISIENGER, both officially and individually; ROBERT GOOD- MAN, both officially and individually,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PATRICIA J. PAYNE, Secretary of the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Develop- ment; MICHAEL A. GLASS, Acting Secretary of the Maryland Department of Budget and Manage- ment; HENRY G. CISNEROS, Secretary of United States Department of Housing and Urban Devel- opment,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-3460-JFM)
Submitted: November 3, 1998 Decided: December 21, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobbie Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Hans Froelicher, IV, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Crownsville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment in favor of Defendants in Appellant’s employment dis-
crimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fisher v. Maryland,
No. CA-96-3460-JFM (D. Md. May 14, 1998). We deny Appellants’
motion for appointment of counsel and motion for a status hearing.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished