U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park

Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 30, 1998

Fowler v. City of Raleigh Park

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2323

MICHAEL A. FOWLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS AND RECREATION DEPART- MENT; GENE TOMLINSON; DANNY F. MORGAN; STANLEY K. MARSHBURN; JERRY M. HOBBY; ALLEN B. HALL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-351-5-BR)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: December 30, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy K. Woodward, CITY OF RALEIGH, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael A. Fowler appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fowler v. City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation De- partment, No. CA-98-351-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.