Heddinger v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Heddinger v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7249

JOSEPH R. HEDDINGER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 1079-L)

Submitted: December 15, 1998 Decided: December 29, 1998

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph R. Heddinger, Appellant Pro Se. Regina Hollins Lewis, As- sistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Heddinger seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for the rea-

son that Heddinger received constitutionally effective assistance

of counsel. See Hill v. Lockhart,

474 U.S. 52, 59

(1985); Strick-

land v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668, 687-94

(1984). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished