United States v. Alsup
United States v. Alsup
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6827
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JACQUE ALSUP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR- 96-192-S, CA-99-67-S)
Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SHEIN, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jacque Alsup seeks to appeal the district court’s orders de-
nying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1999),
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Alsup, Nos. CR-96-102-S; CA-99-67-S (D. Md. May 17
& June 4, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on May 14, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 17, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished