U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Jones v. Johnson

Jones v. Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 14, 1999

Jones v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6885

LEROY JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DOCTOR JOHNSON; DOCTOR MICKEY; PAT CHAVIS; PRENETTE O. DEESE, Defendants - Appellees, and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JOHN DOE, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-550-5-BOF)

Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Jones, Appellant Pro Se. William Dale Talbert, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Dana Hefter Davis, Raleigh, North Carolina; Joseph C. Moore, III, ALLEN & MOORE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Leroy Jones appeals the district court’s order granting sum- mary judgment in favor of the Appellees on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. NCDOC, et al., No. 5:98-CT-550-BOF (E.D.N.C. June 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.