Blevins v. Shannon-Pocahontas
Blevins v. Shannon-Pocahontas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1668
ALBERT T. BLEVINS,
Petitioner,
versus
SHANNON-POCAHONTAS MINING COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (98-328-BLA)
Submitted: October 5, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert T. Blevins, Petitioner Pro Se. William T. Brotherton, III, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Michelle Seyman Gerdano, Patricia May Nece, UNITED STATES DEPART- MENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Albert T. Blevins seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to
30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945(West
1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Blevins v. Shannon-Pocahontas Mining Co., BRB 98-328-
BLA, (B.R.B. April 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished