Horton v. Norfolk Southern

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Horton v. Norfolk Southern

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1491

EUGENE HORTON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, formerly known as Norfolk Southern Corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1247-1)

Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: October 19, 1999

Before HAMILTON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romallus O. Murphy, Sr., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. M. Daniel McGinn, Jennifer K. Van Zant, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eugene Horton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis-

missing his civil action alleging that he was denied benefits from

his former employer because of his race. We have reviewed the rec-

ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the

district court, finding that Horton’s action is barred by his exe-

cution of a valid and comprehensive release. See Horton v. Norfolk

Southern Railway Co., No. CA-97-1247-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished