United States v. Randall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 27, 1999

Opinion

No. 99-6430

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWIN JAY WALKER RANDALL, a/k/a Jay Walker, a/k/a Jamal Carter, a/k/a Mo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-115)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Loren Kimball, Virginia Beach, Virignia, for Appellant. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edwin Jay Walker Randall appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim.

P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-

firm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.

Randall, No. CR-97-115 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.