United States v. Ingram

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ingram

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6987

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER LOUIS INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 99-7131

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER LOUIS INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-116, CA-97-3512-JFM)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Walter Louis Ingram seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motions to reconsider a previous order denying

relief on his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Ingram, Nos. CR-92-116;

CA-97-3512-JFM (D. Md. May 17 & July 27, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished