U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Bramwell

United States v. Bramwell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 27, 1999

United States v. Bramwell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6999

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CAROL BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carol Bramwell appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) (1994) and 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 3582 (West 1985 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bramwell, No. CR-91-429 (E.D. Va. June 2, 1999). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.