Richardson v. Lee
Richardson v. Lee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7107
GREGORY A. RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JACK LEE; SERGEANT COCUS; JANET SALYER; LIEUTENANT MAYBERRY; MR. SHAW; LIEUTENANT MCCLANAHAN; MS. LESTER; MR. HAMMOND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-505)
Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) com-
plaint under
28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1999). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Richardson v. Lee, No. CA-99-505 (W.D. Va.
Aug. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished