Clontz v. Vanyur
Clontz v. Vanyur
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7020
BRIAN KEITH CLONTZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JOHN M. VANYUR; BONNIE HALDERSON; MICHAEL WINKLMEIR; VICTOR SIHA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-115-5-F)
Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Keith Clontz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Brian Keith Clontz appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the dismissal of his complaint alleging a claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Clontz v. Vanyur, No. CA-99-115-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 14, 1999). We grant Clontz’s motion to supplement the record on appeal and dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.