United States v. Christopher Roseboro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Christopher Roseboro

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER ROSEBORO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-34-B, CA-98-74-B)

Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: Octoer 26, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Carmina Szunyog Hughes, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Christopher Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Roseboro, Nos. CR-94-34-

B; CA-98-74-B (D. Md. Apr. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished