U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Christopher Roseboro

United States v. Christopher Roseboro
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 26, 1999

United States v. Christopher Roseboro

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6845

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CHRISTOPHER ROSEBORO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-94-34-B, CA-98-74-B)

Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: Octoer 26, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Carmina Szunyog Hughes, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Christopher Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Roseboro, Nos. CR-94-34- B; CA-98-74-B (D. Md. Apr. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.