U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Bramble v. West

Bramble v. West
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 26, 1999

Bramble v. West

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1693

WILLIAM H. BRAMBLE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR., Secretary of the Army, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-3086-CCB)

Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William H. Bramble, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bramble v. West, No. CA-97-3086-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 12, 1999). We deny Appellant’s various motions for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.