United States v. McKnight

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. McKnight

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7224

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH MCKNIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-96-24-A, CA-99-858-AM)

Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph McKnight, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Joseph Shea, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joseph McKnight seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. McKnight, Nos. CR-96-24-A;

CA-99-858-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on August 20, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on August 23, 1999. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished