Quintero v. Creecy
Quintero v. Creecy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6953
PEDRO GARCIA QUINTERO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES M. CREECY; ALTON R. ANDERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-541-5-H)
Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pedro Garcia Quintero, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assis- tant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Pedro Garcia Quintero appeals the district court’s judgment
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Quintero v. Creecy, No. CA-
98-541-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished