U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Sauls v. Stanton

Sauls v. Stanton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 9, 1999

Sauls v. Stanton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6602

KARMAN JONATHAN SAULS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

BARRY STANTON, Director, Prince George’s Coun- ty Detention Center; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-3784-WMN)

Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas James Wood, ROBERTS & WOOD, Riverdale, Maryland, for Ap- pellant. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Karman Jonathan Sauls seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sauls v. Stanton, No. CA- 98-3784-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.